We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privacy Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Coburan Reform Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2431
Description[?]:
| Protect peoples privacy |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:27:04, July 18, 2007 CET | From |  Party for Individualism and Kitties | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | what a great idea :P |
| Date | 21:33:32, July 18, 2007 CET | From | Coburan Reform Party | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | Excuse my ignorance but what does ':P' mean? |
| Date | 00:00:25, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | Its a tongue poking out. A smilie We oppose this as it will mean criminals will get away with crimes, or can hide evidence. |
| Date | 10:29:30, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Coburan Reform Party | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | Oh yeah, Thank you |
| Date | 15:05:04, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | Is this the federalist party. flip flopping? I believe it is |
| Date | 15:12:55, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Coburan Reform Party | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | It's a tradition |
| Date | 19:58:33, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Federalist Party | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | Not really, and I'll tell you a story. When first proposed, I supported the measure. The CRP proposed again, however it was just after midnight that I got home after working an 11 hour shift so I was really thinking my reasonings before and voted to change. Now I'm rectifying it :) Props to you for noticing though! |
| Date | 20:13:09, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Federalist Party | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | EDIT: It was the DLP not the CRP who proposed change |
| Date | 23:45:29, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | So you8 want to hinder the police in the fight against crime and terrorism? |
| Date | 11:54:18, July 20, 2007 CET | From | Party for Individualism and Kitties | To | Debating the Privacy Protection Act |
| Message | no, he wants to protect peoples' basic righst! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 286 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 117 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 45 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire |