We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: UIF Bill: Regional Powers
Details
Submitted by[?]: I need to make new party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2431
Description[?]:
| This bill is to give more power to regional governments... In some schools kids could be harder to deal with then in others so schools not the national government should set the standards of dealing with Children of Bad Nature. Also Local governments should deal with situations regarding the selling of food. Also since the National Government refuses to deal with Civic defense let local authorities deal with it by giving them the power to protect there citizens. Since Orange party and the Pantian alliance found that defending citizens in a Nuclear or Biological attack on this country didn't matter to them much. Since they can easily hide in military grade bunkers in the capital while people die for there laziness. This bill is to help give power to deal with issues that should be in the local powers to them. No big government more regional power. More Effective |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government makes no provision for civil defence.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Licensing of food sales.
Old value:: The sale of food is unregulated.
Current: Anyone may sell food, but shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Proposed: The licensing of food sale is left for local governments to decide.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The teacher's right to discipline children.
Old value:: Teachers are forbidden from striking children and may only use non-contact discipline (detention, expulsion etc).
Current: No forms of direct discipline are allowed.
Proposed: Discipline levels are set by schools.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:03:12, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Baltusian Pantian Alliance | To | Debating the UIF Bill: Regional Powers |
| Message | The BPA agrees with articles 2 and 3 however will not vote yes while article one is present. |
| Date | 06:27:43, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Gazelle Party | To | Debating the UIF Bill: Regional Powers |
| Message | The Gazelle Party disagrees with Article III. Corporal punishment should never be an option. |
| Date | 18:53:49, July 19, 2007 CET | From | I need to make new party | To | Debating the UIF Bill: Regional Powers |
| Message | Okay I will remove article 1 but article 3 is not saying corporal punishment is allowed just saying its up to the schools. If I remove article one how many people will change and vote for the bill? |
| Date | 03:50:38, July 20, 2007 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the UIF Bill: Regional Powers |
| Message | "just saying its up to the schools" If its up to schools, how do you prevent them from implementing corporal punishment? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 13 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 164 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 23 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard |