We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Local Government Public Transporation Empowerment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2431
Description[?]:
This bill permits local governments to decide whether to subsidize public transportation; yet another effort to devolve power from the bloated central government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Funding of public transport (where applicable).
Old value:: Public transport is fully user-pays.
Current: Public transport is fully user-pays.
Proposed: Local governments decide upon the funding policy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:51:00, July 19, 2007 CET | From | Party Royale | To | Debating the Local Government Public Transporation Empowerment Act |
Message | This is a step in the right direction, but it's not enough. |
Date | 05:01:51, July 20, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Local Government Public Transporation Empowerment Act |
Message | We could go either way on this one, but public funding of public transportation makes us leery. So the MLP will vote NO. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 301 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 146 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 153 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |