We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Give The People of The Commonwealth of Rutania A Strong National Defense Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalist Working Families
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2432
Description[?]:
This simple cut n' dry legislation would enable the PEOPLE of our great nation, The Commonwealth of Rutania, the Fundamental Right to have a Strong National Defense that secures the blessings of individual liberty!!! |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Chemical and Biological Weapon disarmament Treaty.
Article 2
Withdraw from the World Peace Treaty.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: Every public building is required to feature provisions for civil defence and at least 50% of spaces must be allocated to private citizens.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government allows arms to be sold only to close allies.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:23:31, July 20, 2007 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the Give The People of The Commonwealth of Rutania A Strong National Defense Act |
Message | (1) Just some quick comments on our proposals to withdraw from the "World Peace Treaty" and "Chemical & Biological Weapons Disamament Treaty." Now, we ALL agree that use of Chemical, Biological, and Nuclear weapons is an ABOMINATION b/c they can kill innocent civilians. Nevertheless, simply banning them by "law or treaty" will NOT eliminate them b/c ONLY Law-abiding Nations would comply. Criminals, Terrorists, and Nation-States that sponsor Terrorism will disavow the Treaties b/c they have no respect for the law in begin with. Therefore, if they use those weapons, we need the capability to DEFEND the sovereignty of our nation and people. (2) As for the last proposal about not allowing Women to serve alongside men on the frontlines is NOT a "sexist" position. Let me explain: Common sense, of course, a woman with the same training can probably shoot better than 10 men and probably can beat them in a fight. Nevertheless, that is NOT the point. The point is that to be quite honest and "crude", unfortunately, Women should not serve on the Frontlines b/c they can get PREGNANT and men cannot. In other words, if a man dies on the battlefield, it is a terrible loss but biologically speaking he is expendable b/c the average male produces 300 million sperm cells a day whereas a woman produces ONE egg cell per month and then it takes 9 months for her to carry the child to term. Think about it: if massive numbers of women die in battle, we as a Nation will not have the capability to RE-populate. Therefore, society should also try to encourage a higher ratio of women to men. Thanks and I look forward to your support of a Strong National Defense of the nation. |
Date | 10:07:22, July 20, 2007 CET | From | Militaristic Party | To | Debating the Give The People of The Commonwealth of Rutania A Strong National Defense Act |
Message | I commend this bill other than for the fact of not allowing women in battle. We need all the power we can get on the lines fighting, whether or not this is a "hard hit" biologically. |
Date | 11:08:18, July 21, 2007 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the Give The People of The Commonwealth of Rutania A Strong National Defense Act |
Message | Yes, I understand we need as MUCH troops as possible to fight and win war, and I am NOT a "sexist." I believe Women---even MORESO than men---should have a right to keep and bear firearms. However, if women are dying in massive numbers on the battlefield, what will happen when the war is OVER??? We as a Nation will not be able to reproduce effectively if the ratio of men outnumber women b/c ONE man can impregnate a thousand women but one woman could NEVER do the same. In additon, although I am ADAMANTLY opposed to a civilian draft, I believe the gov't of Rutania has a right to draft Prisoners who are currently serving life imprisonment or they are on death row. Btw, forgive me if this is TOO personal of course, but do you mind me asking which REAL country you are from? Thanks and take care. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 86 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 664 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "Hatred is gained as much by good works as by evil." - Niccolo Machiavelli |