Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5477
Next month in: 03:32:39
Server time: 20:27:20, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): albaniansunited | DanivonX | Infinite | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sovereignty Act of 2431

Details

Submitted by[?]: Reform Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2433

Description[?]:

Quotas shall be determined on a year-by-year basis with world events being taken into account for their creation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:07:14, July 20, 2007 CET
FromUnion for Social Justice
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageThe USJ sees no problem with immigration so there is no need for these measures.

Date19:03:02, July 20, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Future Party
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageThe SDF wil never support a bill which imposes unnecessary draconian searches on peoples houses.

Date20:55:12, July 20, 2007 CET
FromUnion for a Responsible Republic
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageWe do not support either Article.

Date01:06:59, July 21, 2007 CET
FromReform Party
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageOn the contrary, there is a huge surplus of immigrants. Such an amount leads to unemployment and wage reduction for our domestic workbase.

As to the concerns to the SDFP, while we don't support a violation to people's right to be secure in their own homes, either, this proposal was the only one that allowed for active searches and expulsion from the country. Naturally, we would want the illegal immigrants to arrested or searched for outside of their homes, however, the mechanics of the game doesn't allow this. Would you be able to ignore that part of the game's choice of words if the Reform Party changed the description to show that people's security in their homes would not be violated?

Date11:26:05, July 21, 2007 CET
FromUnion for Social Justice
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageWhere does this idea of surplus immigrants and resulting high unemployment come from. As far as I can see unemployment in all our cantons is on a very acceptable level.

Date16:19:49, July 21, 2007 CET
FromReform Party
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageWhen you consider the fact that the maximum unemployment rate in Terra is 10%, and that Akinawa and Hebilon aren't too far from that, it doesn't seem like that may be true.

Date16:48:25, July 21, 2007 CET
FromUnion for Social Justice
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageIn both Hevilon and Akinawa the unemployment rate doesn't reach 8%. But in itself that wouldn't mean much. It would only call for these policies if it can be linked to higher levels of immigrants in those cantons.

The USJ likes the fresh ideas and work ethic many immigrants bring to Cildania.

Date19:15:46, July 21, 2007 CET
FromReform Party
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
MessageThe Reform Party does as well. However, unlimited immigration can be dangerous, both in terms of unemployment and security. If immigration levels are so high that the melting pot can no be sustained, then enclaves to with little central government authority can develop.

Date23:06:26, July 21, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Future Party
ToDebating the Sovereignty Act of 2431
Message"Would you be able to ignore that part of the game's choice of words if the Reform Party changed the description to show that people's security in their homes would not be violated?"

We're concerned with police resources being dedicated to actively searching for illegal immigrants. While we accept that ignoring them is not acceptable, we feel that this solution goes too far. We would much prefer "The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but expels them from the country when discovered".

If this was changed, the SDF would provisionally support this bill provided we would get the Reform Party's assurances that Article 2's quotas would be flexible to take in to account world events at any time. We are not in favour of binding year-on-year quotas for immigration.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 160

no
    

Total Seats: 265

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

    Random quote: "It will be years, not in my time, before a woman will become Prime Minister." - Margaret Thatcher

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70