We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agriculture Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Military Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2107
Description[?]:
| A reform of agricultural conditions in the country of Hutori |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Licensing of food sales.
Old value:: not recorded
Current: Anyone may sell food, but shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Proposed: Anyone may sell food, but shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:34:41, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Ruthlessly Random Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | Ooc: It really isn't a good idea to put forward huge bills. Although some people might approve of one or two articles it is highly unlikely they will approve of every single one. |
| Date | 01:36:31, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Federal Technocrats | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | OOC: Ditto. IC: We distinctly dislike the first article, it being a key are of our party's ideology. Because of this, we are unable to support this bill unless Article 1 is struck. We also dislike article's 5 and 7, 5 because of our stance on moral imperitives overriding medical safety, and 7 because we consider such social freedoms vital for all employees, and would prefer that replacement employees are ready for society critical services rather than denying their right to take political action for political change. The remaining articles we have no concerns with. |
| Date | 02:33:03, August 10, 2005 CET | From | United Military Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | OOC: Duely noted |
| Date | 11:30:45, August 13, 2005 CET | From | Federal Technocrats | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | As an alternative to our own proposal, we see little purpose given the reasons we have cited in the debate on the 'Consumer Security Act'. |
| Date | 03:51:08, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Federal Technocrats | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 16:55:14, August 31, 2005 CET | From | United Military Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | Excuse me, but did you call for support for this bill or you yourself are (gr?) supporting it? I don't have a clue. |
| Date | 06:06:46, September 03, 2005 CET | From | Federal Technocrats | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | We believe they are one in the same. We agree with the bill ourselves, and therefore obviously would call upon others to do the same. |
| Date | 00:01:51, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Ruthlessly Random Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | ooc: wtf? I just read this and it was fine...logged in to vote...and it timed out. I'm good :p |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 129 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 113 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "I'm the motherfucking Premier of Kalistan. It don't get more full time than that!" - Omar Al-Khali, former Kalistani politician |