We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Infrastructure Reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Oligarchists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2093
Description[?]:
| Isn't the name inventive? :P |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works and for corporate use.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Current: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Proposed: The victim of eminent domain determines just compensation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:04:58, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Oligarchists | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Bill |
| Message | The second being there to make sure the first isn't abused. |
| Date | 11:06:40, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Anarchista Kommunista Csapat | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Bill |
| Message | I prefer the neutral arbitration we have now for compensation. As for the issue of Eminent Domain itself, I can't allow this bill which expands the power of corperate oligarchs, cozy withe government, to abuse individuals' rights. |
| Date | 12:23:22, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Kaiserliche Bundpartei | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Bill |
| Message | Agreed. |
| Date | 07:25:43, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Capitalist Freedom Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Bill |
| Message | I have no problem with section 1, but I dislike the change to section 2. I rather liked the neutral body to decide. Ho Hum. I'll probably vote no, but only because of #2. |
| Date | 09:07:15, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Oligarchists | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Bill |
| Message | Bleh. Next time I'll prolly split. |
| Date | 09:16:55, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Capitalist Freedom Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Bill |
| Message | That would be a better approach IMO |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 38 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 207 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned. |
| Random quote: "Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man." - Stewart Udall |