We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Border and security act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamon National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2093
Description[?]:
This Bill will gurantee our country is safe from Terroist attacks. This will give us control of our nations population and stop the spread of disease. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Current: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Proposed: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Current: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Proposed: No foreigners are permitted to reside permanently in this nation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The national refugee policy.
Old value:: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Current: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Proposed: No refugees are allowed to enter the country.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:39:30, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | WE can never be sure that people entering the country are here on the grounds of being peacful and intergrating yo our society and culture. We need to Ban any one entering the country and staying here permantly. We need to put our own people saftey and needs first. |
Date | 18:20:02, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | There is no way to protect against terrorist attacks absolutly, thus, we believe that the increased economic growth afforded by postive immigration will outweigh any threat of terrorism. |
Date | 18:52:08, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Marxist Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | There is no way to endure that our own people aren't terrorists. Most terrorista are home-grown. |
Date | 19:30:22, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | Home grown from Imported ideas, Immigration will bring in people who will work for less so wages for our people will lower and make it harder for them to find a job. |
Date | 20:07:09, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Marxist Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | No, home-grown from discontent with the current political system. Some may claim a secular state is an affront to God, others may say it is not secular, it is a theocracy etc... If all bad ideas are imported where is their home province? Is there a nation somewhere of complete and total evil, with terrorists on every corner? Don't expect much support if you keep going on with this totalitarian thing. I may dislike some of the other parties here but even they favor democracy. |
Date | 21:25:20, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | I favour democracy and do not want to stop freedom of speach at all and I do not say that here. |
Date | 00:10:15, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | You will all Vote yes if you want Telamon to be safe. |
Date | 00:11:41, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Partiya Nacionalnogo Progressa | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | Sounds terroristicaly. "You will all Vote yes if you want your families to be safe" :) |
Date | 00:20:36, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Theological Technocratic Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | Shutting our great nation off from the rest of the world, which is the mindset of this law if not the exact letter, will ultimately do little but doom us to irrelevancy on the global scale. The only other nations I can think of with such restrictive border policies are Cuba and Bhutan--and no offense to either nation, but neither are serious global powers or are likely to be any time soon. |
Date | 03:36:35, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | Cuba has open borders, just Americans are arrested if they show up. Bhutan is a good example though, infant mortality rate is highest in the world last I saw. |
Date | 05:55:47, August 11, 2005 CET | From | Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United | To | Debating the Border and security act |
Message | Americans are allowed in Cuba.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 14 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 241 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
Random quote: "How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese?" Charles De Gaulle, "Les Mots du General |