We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sexual Material Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bloc Militaire pour Restauration
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2437
Description[?]:
The government allows the use of sexually explicit material on tv |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Current: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Proposed: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:48:08, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Drtárék Jelbék Prta | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | What need is there for violent porn on television? |
Date | 12:59:50, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Bloc Militaire pour Restauration | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | When people don't want to watch porn they can tun off, people who want to watch it should be free to watch because it hinders no one else |
Date | 13:42:10, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Parti Communiste de Jelbania | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | We support. This will add to the liberties of our people. |
Date | 14:11:34, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | We oppose this effort to further erode our culture and damage the well-being of our children. |
Date | 19:59:57, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Drtárék Jelbék Prta | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | JCP, how does this fit in with Communism? In what way does this benefit the masses? Is pornography not merely another distraction dragging the proletariat into a false consciousness and preventing them from benefitting themselves? If the JCP are Communists, stand for Communism, not for pathetic social democracy. LPJ, that is nonsense. By refusing to regulate pornography, the government hinders parents, by adding yet another worry for them to be concerned with. Furthermore your argument is flawed. If people want to watch porn, fine. But we are not merely talking about acceptable porn here, we are talking about violent and hardcore pornography, the graphic humilation and degradation of participants. Why on earth on such sick filth something that the government should make easier for people to watch? Don't suggest there is no harm in such stuff, because by its existence pornography changes peoples opinions of the human body, turning it into a mere object for gratification, nothing more. |
Date | 23:49:35, July 30, 2007 CET | From | Parti Communiste de Jelbania | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | You will understand i am sure that my idea of Communism doesn' t involve trying to make people think the way we want it. It involves creating a society where everyone is working for the country and where everyone can live decently. We want every citizen to give the same thing to the society and we want them to be free to do whatever they wish to do when this part of their day is over. Communism you see, doesn't involve dictatorship. |
Date | 03:08:30, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Drtárék Jelbék Prta | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | Then the JCP are not Communists. We have not said that communism equals dictatorship. But it is an essential part of communism to free the proletariat from bourgeoise distractions that aim to tie the proletariat down, organised sport, pornography etc etc If Communists do not aim to free the masses, then what is the point in their existence? |
Date | 11:24:15, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Parti Communiste de Jelbania | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | We don't want to kill rich people. Equalty stands for everyone or it is not equalty. |
Date | 12:32:37, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Drtárék Jelbék Prta | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | One wonders if the JCP are actually reading the comments. Initially nothing was said about dictatorships, yet the Communists raised this, secondly nothing was said about killing rich people, the Communists raised this. All the JKK suggest is that the JCP are not out to benefit the workers, but to continue their distraction by the bourgeoise preventing them from taking what is rightfully theirs. |
Date | 17:44:00, July 31, 2007 CET | From | Parti Communiste de Jelbania | To | Debating the Sexual Material Act |
Message | "Is pornography not merely another distraction dragging the proletariat into a false consciousness and preventing them from benefitting themselves?" "a false consciousness" ??? Is there a true consciousness ? Believing that there is, leads to dictatorship JKK. Forced communism is not communism, it is dictatorship. "taking what is rightfully theirs." ??? Do you see "revolutionary" somewhere in the name of my party ? Democracy will lead us to give the workers what is rightfully theirs. Rich and poor deserve the same and rich don't have to be guilty of anything, they only need to take their responsability to make this society change. When we succeed, "bourgeoise" won't mean anything anymore, as well as "proletariat". We believe in democracy you see. Someday, they will all understand what is best for them and the others. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 351 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 150 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life religions should not be referenced in Particracy. Terra has its own religions, many of which mirror real-life ones. See: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Illustrated_Catalogue_of_Religion |
Random quote: "I am interested in politics so that one day I will not have to be interested in politics." - Ayn Rand |