We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: State Energy Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Drtárék Jelbék Prta
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2438
Description[?]:
We propose that energy is too important an asset to be left in the hands of the private sector, therefore we propose that it is brought fully under state control. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Current: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Proposed: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: Each region owns and maintains its own power grid.
Current: A single private company owns and maintains the national power grid.
Proposed: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Proposed: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:02:55, July 30, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the State Energy Bill |
Message | we strongly oppose |
Date | 13:29:37, July 30, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the State Energy Bill |
Message | We support |
Date | 14:16:42, July 30, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the State Energy Bill |
Message | Strongly oppose - nationalizing industry stifles innovation and creates an inefficient centralized bureaucracy. |
Date | 19:51:58, July 30, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the State Energy Bill |
Message | Whereas having unregulated business control over vital resources leads to exploitation and profiteering at the expense of the average hardworking Jelbanian family. If the state has control there is accountability and it is possible to prevent exploitation. If the state has no say in the matter, there is no accountability whatsoever. |
Date | 10:25:06, July 31, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the State Energy Bill |
Message | Privatization leads to competition between different companies and therefore to lower prices a state monopoly leads however to a high price for consumer; which is better? |
Date | 12:31:03, July 31, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the State Energy Bill |
Message | That describes the perfect scenario. However as we have no regulation currently, what is more likely, businesses competing and reducing their profits, or businesses forming cartels to ensure that they can rip off the consumer? Which is more likely, the human desire for greater profits, or a desire to benefit the consumer? |
Date | 00:55:12, August 02, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the State Energy Bill |
Message | we don't like these proposals, nor the current law, so we abstain |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 126 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 375 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation. |
Random quote: "Without opposition there is no politics." - Alun Daffys, former Alorian politician |