Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:04:54
Server time: 19:55:05, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Parliament Rules Agreement

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Frontier Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2094

Description[?]:

I: We shall state on the presenting of bills to the floor when a vote will be cast.
II:We will not vote or present a new cabinet unless we are formally casting a lot of no confidence in the government.
III: We will only cause a vote for early elections if the government has failed in holding the confidence of this body
IV: the government may shift ministers as needed with approval of the parliament

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:15:15, August 10, 2005 CET
From New Frontier Party
ToDebating the The Parliament Rules Agreement
MessageI believe this may be a comprimise which will enable us to work more efficently

Date02:19:04, August 10, 2005 CET
From Liberty Party of Saridan
ToDebating the The Parliament Rules Agreement
MessageWe oppose. This limits the rights of each party and therefore is ridiculus!

Date02:21:24, August 10, 2005 CET
From New Frontier Party
ToDebating the The Parliament Rules Agreement
MessageThis is an agreement to organize our important work here. I will add also that we can still call for new elections and new cabinets but do so -by declaring a lack of confidence in the government-.

Date02:34:12, August 10, 2005 CET
From freedom party
ToDebating the The Parliament Rules Agreement
MessageWe dont agree with this compromise and see it as mostly pointless.
But it is a step, albeit a small one, in the right direction.

Date03:08:53, August 10, 2005 CET
From New Frontier Party
ToDebating the The Parliament Rules Agreement
MessageI feel that we do need some structure and guidence to help work as a more efficent body. This is why i felt a small step comprimise would be needed

Date23:04:24, August 10, 2005 CET
From freedom party
ToDebating the The Parliament Rules Agreement
MessageWe seek our bills passing. However, as an insurance, we hope this median point is accepted in the very least.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 63

no
    

Total Seats: 171

abstain
  

Total Seats: 66


Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

Random quote: "While we may not always agree it is my hope that we may always be civil." - Jonathan Clarke, former Hutorian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52