We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sustainability act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Permissive Social Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2438
Description[?]:
| With reference to a previous bill introduced by the LFF, there is no point in Blut und Boden, if there is no Boden. Therefore in the interests of an economically independent and healthy state, we propose the following. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of endangered animals.
Old value:: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Current: Local governments decide about this.
Proposed: Keeping endangered animals, or trading therein, is forbidden.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: The government funds recycling facilities but enforces mandatory recycling for industry only.
Current: Local governments decide about this.
Proposed: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:48:39, July 31, 2007 CET | From |  Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Sustainability act |
| Message | We support the mandatory recycling of residents. |
| Date | 04:19:24, August 02, 2007 CET | From | Ars Moriendi Party | To | Debating the Sustainability act |
| Message | Articles 1 and 2 are irrelevant to the purpose of government and needlessly invasive. Article 3 is supportable, but not with 1 and 2 attached as riders. |
| Date | 07:39:18, August 02, 2007 CET | From | Permissive Social Union | To | Debating the Sustainability act |
| Message | The bill will be presented to the floor in it's entirity, where it will pass or fail on it's merits. |
| Date | 07:41:10, August 02, 2007 CET | From | Riot of Lone Romantics | To | Debating the Sustainability act |
| Message | I will vote yes for this purely on the fact that the relevence and effect that Article 3 will make, will overrule the irrelevancies of Articles 2 and 3. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 378 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 288 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
| Random quote: "Democracy is more dangerous than fire. Fire can't vote itself immune to water." - Michael Z. Williamson |