Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:04:30
Server time: 20:55:29, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Vice Act of 2441

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Right Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2441

Description[?]:

This bill seeks to to establish a national policy of deference to local governments in the regulation of recreational vices.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:26:18, August 06, 2007 CET
FromFederalists Party
ToDebating the Vice Act of 2441
MessageWe strongly support the spirit of this bill, but cannot support articles 1 and 4. We fail to see the need for licensing alcohol vendors beyond filling government coffers. We also support private property rights, which article 4 somewhat tramples on. However, articles 2 and 3 have our complete and steadfast support.

Date08:26:33, August 06, 2007 CET
FromQuasi-Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Vice Act of 2441
MessageAgainst Article 1 because of the aforementioned reason by the Federalist Party. The government need not get involved with licensing. In support of Article 2. Article 3 I am ambivalent to since both options are viable. Article 4 should be left up to the local community, so I am opposed.

Date23:01:42, August 06, 2007 CET
FromUnited Right Party
ToDebating the Vice Act of 2441
MessageWe are willing to drop Article 1, as it is not critical to the intent of the bill. We feel that an appropriate compromise can also be reached on the smoking issue: removing the licensing requirements in favor of enforcing non-smoking areas, which we feel is a fair price for employers to pay in order to set their own smoking regulations.

Date23:11:05, August 06, 2007 CET
FromMoralist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Vice Act of 2441
MessageExcept for Article 4, we support this bill. It's better to allow the localities to determine what "moral sensibilities" its citizens have.

Date05:28:25, August 09, 2007 CET
FromRadical Wantunism Cult
ToDebating the Vice Act of 2441
MessageThe LSF strongly does not support this bill, because it is only trampling on the people's rights and an attempt to create a larger government.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 333

no
   

Total Seats: 167

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

    Random quote: "With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day." - Martin Luther King Jr.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76