We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill for the Banning of Public Intercourse
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Liberalism Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2442
Description[?]:
| Sex in public? Honestly, people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:10:28, August 10, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa) | To | Debating the Bill for the Banning of Public Intercourse |
| Message | This should be a matter for local governments. |
| Date | 19:11:18, August 10, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Rationalists (PrCoa) | To | Debating the Bill for the Banning of Public Intercourse |
| Message | In any event, we really don't have a problem with sex in public places like parks, etc. 'Long as people aren't creating a public health hazard. We're just kooky like that. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 148 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 386 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 66 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H. L. Mencken |