Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5476
Next month in: 02:19:39
Server time: 17:40:20, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): aai14 | NL | R Drax | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Local Governments Empowerment Act - I

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2442

Description[?]:

The United Party seeks, as a consequence of the unquestioned value of responsible government within sub-national entities, to grant certain powers to these in order to streamline the provision of services and goods within the Nation as a whole; this is particularly relevant given the variation in moral standards between urban and rural areas and the unhappiness which a solid and inflexible approach to the enforcement of laws and practices often incompatible with one or the other has caused.

Moreover, it is expected and certainly hoped by the United Party that this Act should be the first of several, in accordance with these principles and the undoubted practicality of their implementation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:00:05, August 12, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Workers Party
ToDebating the Local Governments Empowerment Act - I
MessageWe are a country not a federation. Why not just let people chose their own laws?

Date17:59:31, August 12, 2007 CET
FromUnited Party
ToDebating the Local Governments Empowerment Act - I
MessageAlthough it may surprise the Communist party to hear this (being, as they are, entirely out of touch with the needs and wishes of this Country) but it is a Known Fact that local administration increases popular satisfaction with government as a whole due to the understanding shown towards particular local issues which it may not be appropriate to consider on a national basis.

It is also known that a majority of the population of certain sub-national entities supports the concept of decentralisation in itself, which suggests that the representation so far given to them by the existing parties has been entirely unsatisfactory.

Furthermore, this proposal in essence does exactly what the Communists - unsurprisingly! - question why it does not! Its enactment will allow people to choose their own laws, exactly as I am sure the greater part of them would, if they had but the slightest opportunity to do so.

Date18:25:18, August 12, 2007 CET
FromFree Movement of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Local Governments Empowerment Act - I
MessageThough I believe that the local govts need more power than they have, I believe that the issues you bring up are issues that should be handled on a national level

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 362

abstain
    

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: When you join the game, you will find yourself with only zero seats. That's because your party's representatives haven't been elected yet. You need to establish your party's position on issues by proposing several bills that your party wants passed and sending them to vote. This raises your visibility and if you do it enough, you will win seats at the next election.

Random quote: "'The illusion of Pontesi nationhood'. The Serpent speaks. How can they say these things? How can they call our country an illusion? You can see it clear as day, these people won’t stop until they’ve destroyed us all." - Morgan Einar, former Pontesian general

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64