We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fair Employer Policy
Details
Submitted by[?]: CSA Pax et Socialism
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2442
Description[?]:
EMPLOYING fair policies in hiring, job opportunities, payment, and treatment. LESSENING the very high unemployment rate. IMPROVING employer-to-employee relations. ADJUSTING the power the workers have in their jobs, such as rights and a fair say. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Positive discrimination.
Old value:: The government does not regulate hiring policies.
Current: The government does not regulate hiring policies.
Proposed: The government sets compulsory quotas for hiring women, minorities and marginalized groups.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:59:11, August 15, 2007 CET | From | Retro-Futurist Party | To | Debating the Fair Employer Policy |
Message | Hiring policies should be based entirely upon the skill of the applicant, and not on the color of his or her skin, for any reason. |
Date | 11:11:51, August 15, 2007 CET | From | Cosa Nostra | To | Debating the Fair Employer Policy |
Message | We must agree. We liked it better when you proposed no dicrimination whatsoever a few bills ago... |
Date | 17:29:43, August 15, 2007 CET | From | CSA Pax et Socialism | To | Debating the Fair Employer Policy |
Message | Oh whoops I voted wrong. I read on the Particracy forum that voting against your own bills is just as good as voting for them, so I made a bill to vote against. Saying minorities are better than the majority is just as bad as saying they are worse. This is inequality, and we vote against. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 117 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 389 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election) |