We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Censure against Deltarian Injustices
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2444
Description[?]:
| WE, the government of the Second Imperial Republic of Hobrazia, hereby censure the recent xenophobic policies of the Deltarian Government, which has deprived groups of their rights to live within the Stvrtý Republika. The expulsion of the Jews, Mormons, and French has highlighted the inadequacy of the post-Junta regime in terms of basic civil liberties and tolerance of minorities. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:00:43, August 15, 2007 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | We cannot interfere in foreign nations policy if we in the future wants to decide our own for ourself. We also advice the Gvoernment to take precautions regarding refugees and immigrants from Deltaria as we before have experienced great problems and terrorist situations with refugees from this country. But again, we state that this is not ours to decide. We must respect another elected governments decisions even though we disagree and believe it might be a bad decision. |
| Date | 17:12:47, August 15, 2007 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | We see this bill as anti-Deltarian propagander by the religious fanatics. |
| Date | 04:18:11, August 16, 2007 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | "We cannot interfere in foreign nations policy if we in the future wants to decide our own for ourself." We're not- the bill just asks for a formal scolding. "We see this bill as anti-Deltarian propagander [sic] by the religious fanatics." No, this is anti-asshole. We are pro-Deltarian as they are our blood brothers. That does not mean we like every policy of their regime. And we're not fanatics, as evidenced by our voting record. And it isn't propaganda by the Mormons or Jews, as we are the ones crying out for their injustice. So basically your objection means precisely nothing. |
| Date | 12:37:49, August 17, 2007 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | We might be their fathers in a historic context, but we are not their parents and as such can not allow ourself to scold. |
| Date | 09:35:59, August 18, 2007 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | @HPP: That's not what we meant at all. As their peers, however, we have every right to scold their actions. |
| Date | 09:38:22, August 18, 2007 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | ooc: I'm not sure if we could be their "fathers" in a historic sense, so much as siblings or cousins, but that would make some interesting RP if we did take such an attitude. Hmmm *scheming* |
| Date | 12:47:15, August 18, 2007 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | haha |
| Date | 23:11:41, August 18, 2007 CET | From | Indigo Party | To | Debating the Censure against Deltarian Injustices |
| Message | I believe that the Jews should not be prejudiced against, bu the French and Mormons... well, what can I say. They had it coming. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 220 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 180 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |