Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 02:42:57
Server time: 05:17:02, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2442

Details

Submitted by[?]: Militarist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2443

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:54:11, August 16, 2007 CET
FromMilitarist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2442
MessageOOC: That's it. I'm only proposing this one for ACTIVE parties. That's right, even our largest party is NOT included in this one.

Date01:42:51, August 17, 2007 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2442
MessageOOC: Yeah, we've been nice in trying to include everyone, but I hate how the proposals have kept failing due to abstentions.

Date03:13:32, August 17, 2007 CET
FromUnited Malivia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2442
MessageOOC: Agreed.

Date06:07:19, August 17, 2007 CET
FromSt. George's Xtreme Coalition Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2442
MessageWe're hurt. But not TOO terribly hurt, since we have been minimally-active lately.

Date13:14:28, August 17, 2007 CET
FromPeoples Movement for an Obedient Society
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2442
MessageOOC I wont support this since im not covered. But that is expected :P I was active until 3 days ago, and was considered in the last one of these but nevermind :)

Date04:50:27, August 19, 2007 CET
FromMalivian National Unity Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2442
MessageOOC: I'm clearly opposed to this. Due to issues with moderation; my account was deactivated on numerous occasions causing initially a loss of seats and so on and so forth. Also, right now I'm not appearing as an active party and can't vote on issues...

I plan on asking the moderation about this but, based of conversations with various parties I was hoping this proposal would reflect some of our expertises and desires. However, with no apparent clout at the moment I will digress and not vote-as I can't! Heh, who knows what in the world is going on here.

Cheers Fellow Parties!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 514

no
  

Total Seats: 4

abstain
 

Total Seats: 55


Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

Random quote: "The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods." - John Maynard Keynes

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 77