Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 00:15:36
Server time: 15:44:23, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): burgerboys | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 2443

Details

Submitted by[?]: First Party Of Hobrazia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2443

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:55:45, August 17, 2007 CET
FromFirst Party Of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2443
MessageWe hope all will agree to this grand coalition, this is for the benefit of the people of this great nation.

Date16:30:04, August 17, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2443
MessageWe don't see all parties of the Front Bench present and as such expect this cabinet to fail.

Date19:43:58, August 17, 2007 CET
FromFirst Party Of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2443
MessageYou mean sir, that you don't see your party present, which is no different from a cabinet put together by you, which excludes the largest party, us. This is a unifying coalition for the benefit of the people.

Date20:07:07, August 17, 2007 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2443
MessageWe have commitments to the Front Bench parties and as such can't let any of them out in our cabinet proposals. We do not wish to either. We believe it is very well known that the FPoH and the HPP have a history and do not get along well. Therefore you are excluded. Isn't it better to have a working cabinet that can cooperate in leading the nation, than to fit in the largest party just because they are the largest? Also, any cabinet must be approved by 50% +1 of the Senate which in union will be the largest party (coallition). So don't get to powerhungry and claim a spot like it is FPoH's to own, just because they fill the most seats.

We have no regulation and segregation on party seats in the Senate restaurant as we recall, should this also be implemented to fit the party sizes?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 160

no
   

Total Seats: 192

abstain
 

Total Seats: 48


Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum!

Random quote: "There is only one corner of the universe you can be certain of improving, and that's your own self." - Aldous Huxley

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65