We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Coleslaw Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sectual Congress
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2445
Description[?]:
Measures that will make our country better. Regarding foreign embassies: Other countries may find it offensive that we require them to go through our red tape to have an embassy here. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Firefighting services.
Old value:: Fire prevention and management is left to the local governments.
Current: There is a national fire department, funded by the government.
Proposed: There is a national fire department, funded by the government.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:23:03, August 19, 2007 CET | From | Socialist Party of Greater Hulstria | To | Debating the Coleslaw Act |
Message | Remove Article 3 and we will vote yes. |
Date | 21:26:40, August 19, 2007 CET | From | Socialist Party of Greater Hulstria | To | Debating the Coleslaw Act |
Message | We shall now support. |
Date | 22:03:53, August 19, 2007 CET | From | Gao-Showa Imperial Party | To | Debating the Coleslaw Act |
Message | We don't wish to have the embassy of a ountry that is our enemy, that supports ilegal activity or a government we do not recognize openning an embassy on our soil. |
Date | 22:04:10, August 19, 2007 CET | From | Gao-Showa Imperial Party | To | Debating the Coleslaw Act |
Message | Als we do not support article 1 |
Date | 05:50:21, August 20, 2007 CET | From | Sectual Congress | To | Debating the Coleslaw Act |
Message | Why not have an enemy country's enemy though? We still need to talk to them. |
Date | 05:50:30, August 20, 2007 CET | From | Sectual Congress | To | Debating the Coleslaw Act |
Message | I mean embassy. |
Date | 23:16:18, August 20, 2007 CET | From | R.I.F.T. | To | Debating the Coleslaw Act |
Message | I'm torn. I like the second half of the bill, but the first half just doesn't appeal to RIFT at all. I'll have to vote no, but I could be persuaded to go the other way on a lone fire department proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 153 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 330 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 17 |
Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
Random quote: "When women are depressed, they either eat or go shopping. Men invade another country. It's a whole different way of thinking." - Elaine Boosler |