We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Motto Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamonese Cultural Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2448
Description[?]:
| We need a new national motto. "Onward Telamon, Onward Macon" reflects the now-defunct Union of Macon, which Telamon is not a member of. Hutori and Davostan, while our immediate neighbors, are of little concern to the Commonwealth. Some suggestions: "Fowards with God for Emperor and Country" "A Commonwealth of Steel, a Future of Gold" "Five Cantons, One Commonwealth" "Telamon Endures" "We Will Prosper" "Family, Ferescia, Fatherland" "Now We are Free" (FHP suggested) "Live Long and Prosper" (FHP suggested) Please debate and offer your own. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The national motto.
Old value:: Onward Telamon, Onward Macon
Current: Tælmörk mun standast tímans tönn
Proposed: Commonwealth of Steel, Future of Gold
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:37:34, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | "Now we are free" |
| Date | 22:27:46, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | We would support "Telamon Endures" |
| Date | 01:10:15, August 24, 2007 CET | From | Telamonese Cultural Alliance | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | How about having "Telamon Endures" in Latin? "Telamon Superest" |
| Date | 17:47:04, August 24, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | A latin motto sounds like a good idea, actually. But "Telamon Superest" soundfs like something a child would say. It's not just super, it's the superest. How about: Iam nos es solvo |
| Date | 22:47:31, August 24, 2007 CET | From | Telamonese Cultural Alliance | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | Considering that means "now I save us, thou art," I don't see the appeal. |
| Date | 22:52:12, August 24, 2007 CET | From | Telamonese Cultural Alliance | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | If people are willing support "Telamon Endures" in English as the motto...? |
| Date | 18:11:10, August 25, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | it does? That's strange. I put "Now we are free" into an english -> latin translator, and it returned Iam nos es solvo. Out of the choices you placed originally, the Free Humanity Party favors the following "A Commonwealth of Steel, a Future of Gold" "Five Cantons, One Commonwealth" "We Will Prosper" We feel "Telamon endures" is too generic. |
| Date | 06:34:02, August 26, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | "live long, and prosper" : ) |
| Date | 12:51:04, August 26, 2007 CET | From | Telamonese Cultural Alliance | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | Keep debating. The PTC will hold off moving this to a vote until after the 2447 elections. |
| Date | 23:13:43, August 26, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | I would agree to "A Commonwealth of Steel, a Future of Gold" and "Telamon Endures" - maybe adding a last word or second sentence would make it less generic? |
| Date | 22:00:58, August 27, 2007 CET | From |  Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United | To | Debating the National Motto Act |
| Message | NO GOD THERE IS NO GOD YOU IDIOTS |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 576 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 174 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill |