We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Organ Donation Freedom Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2446
Description[?]:
| The current organ donation laws, that automatically assume consent (in cases in which the individual has not died) our unethical and need to be changed. Therefore the DSP proposes the following; |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning organ donations.
Old value:: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Current: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Proposed: Organ donations are legal with personal consent.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:13:40, August 23, 2007 CET | From |   Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Organ Donation Freedom Bill |
| Message | CeC supports the opt-in system. |
| Date | 07:36:45, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Superhuman Creation Party | To | Debating the Organ Donation Freedom Bill |
| Message | No. We need as many precious, precious organs as possible. It should be MANDATORY. |
| Date | 08:12:25, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Aristocracy United | To | Debating the Organ Donation Freedom Bill |
| Message | Lisa: Dr. Hibbert, I thought you'd located another kidney for Grampa! Hibbert: Larry Hagman took it. He's got five of them now! And three hearts! We didn't want to give them to him but he overpowered us. This is why the AU believes in bountiful organ harvesting. |
| Date | 08:31:36, August 23, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Freedom Bill |
| Message | No one would ever be given that many organs, nor would you actually be able to survive without major cellular and genetic manipulation. This bill makes sure that you don't wake-up after having coming in for a routine check-up with organs missing. |
| Date | 04:07:20, August 24, 2007 CET | From | Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Organ Donation Freedom Bill |
| Message | This was a close vote! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 288 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 287 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 24 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man." - Stewart Udall |