We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Handing Protection back to the Provinces
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberty Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2447
Description[?]:
| In a move away from our traditional centrist views on defense, the Liberty Party realizes the Provincial government's increased efficiency in providing shelters for a smaller area of which they are more accustomed to the population and how it functions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: No new buildings may be constructed unless they feature provisions for civil defence.
Proposed: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:54:21, August 24, 2007 CET | From |  Democratic Trade Unionist Party | To | Debating the Handing Protection back to the Provinces |
| Message | We are glad to see the Liberty Party accepting the beneifts of federalisation for a change |
| Date | 09:45:31, August 25, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Handing Protection back to the Provinces |
| Message | I thought you might. Believe us, this is only for strategic reasons. When it comes to economics and civil liberties, we believe the state, the central state, must protect the rights of all individuals, and not let the local governments dictate their lives and regulate their wallets. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 159 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 95 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 147 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
| Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag |