Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5574
Next month in: 00:06:47
Server time: 15:53:12, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): FairLeader45 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: MDP suggested adjustments

Details

Submitted by[?]: Moderate Party of The Free Republic

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2449

Description[?]:

This is a list of suggestions that can be adjusted depending on public opinion and logical reasoning.


Article 1 mainly benefits the army itself, those career soldiers who make a living from fighting in wars or peacekeeping do not want a spotty teenager from university slowing the gears of war down. All in all in this day and age of surgical precision in war we do not need to clog the ranks with unwilling amateurs putting operations at risk.

Article 2 allows the nation of Dorvik to look at space exploration from a number of angles, which is naturally the best way to approach something, while keeping a government hand on precedings.

Article 3 suggests that a way forward in terms of the economy could be achieved by dealing weapons to close allies thus greatly benefiting the economy yet not providing any major risk to the security of our great nation.


b

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:24:44, August 28, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
MessageThe Technocratic Nationalist Party will support articles three and four, but not articles one and two. We are intrigued by article three; why the sudden change of heart?

Date13:16:18, August 28, 2007 CET
FromModerate Party of The Free Republic
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
MessageThe TNP originally suggested licensed space agencies but this article is proposing various privatized branches (of a sort) of the national space agency that would mean we wouldn't necessarily have to spend alot of money on wages and the like, but would also allow the benefits of a larger team. I also feel that as a member of your Extrasolar expansion initiative i should try and progress the aims of the society.

Also why do you disagree with articles 1 & 2 your reasoning would help a great deal.

Date14:10:58, August 28, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
MessageWe understand, and even agree with the MPD's rationale behind article two. However, we are against it due to the obvious fact that it would reduce the amount of soldiers we could mobilize at any one time. Simply put, we could deploy the entirety of our volunteer forces while the conscripts stay at home to guard ammo dumps and the like, at least in theory.

As for article one, we feel that continued research in these fields can possibly result in more effective devices that do not result in the agonizing deaths commonly associated with weapons of this sort. While the concept of a "humane" biological or chemical weapon may be considered by many as ludicrous or even offensive, the ability to essentially euthanize an opposing armed force en masse should be considered as an option, if obtaining victory on the battlefield is somehow impossible by conventional means.

Of course, we absolutely do not wish to see any of these weapons used in any real conflict; however, who knows what threats Dorvik may face tomorrow?

Date15:20:34, August 28, 2007 CET
FromSupreme Party of the Republic
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
MessageWe agree with the TNP articles 1 & 2 however, when we proposed the Nactional Security Act we stated clearly that we would never use the biological or chemical weapons for military purposes.
We are not fully convinced about the benefits of article 3.
I would like to ask our Foreign Minister to give us a light about who are our close allies but we think its a great idea to help our allies in need.

Date23:47:51, August 28, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
MessageResearching the technology is permitted by the National Security Act, though production or usage of any weapons is not.

Date23:52:25, August 28, 2007 CET
FromModerate Party of The Free Republic
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
Messagefair enough, article 1 will be removed as i would want this bill to pass and have no desire to let its 'lesser' points fail.

Date05:12:39, August 29, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
MessageAfter much deliberation, the Technocratic Nationalist Party has decided to accept this bill in its current form.

Date13:22:14, August 31, 2007 CET
FromModerate Party of The Free Republic
ToDebating the MDP suggested adjustments
MessageSo you would wish to keep it as it is now?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 33

no
   

Total Seats: 341

abstain
    

Total Seats: 25


Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/

Random quote: "The trouble with unemployment is that the minute you wake up in the morning you're on the job." - Slappy White

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69