Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:53:39
Server time: 12:06:20, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): JVTA | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Mandatory Vote Explanation Act of 2447

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2448

Description[?]:

The DSP feels that for the good of the people, that is so they know how there representatives feel, all votes, excluding those that are obvious (like voting for our national be the cock-rocket etc.), should require a mandatory explanation of why each party votes for or against it.


OOC:
It's really boring when there is no debate for most of the bills, and it helps in the creation of future bills if we know why bills are voted against.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:17:22, August 28, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Act of 2447
MessageFair enough, but there's really no way I can see to enforce it, besides being dicks and downvoting any proposals the party makes.

And I agree, since people would obviously vote overwhelmingly for a National Cock-Rocket, freebies like those should go without saying.

Date03:17:22, August 28, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Act of 2447
MessageFair enough, but there's really no way I can see to enforce it, besides being dicks and downvoting any proposals the party makes.

And I agree, since people would obviously vote overwhelmingly for a National Cock-Rocket, freebies like those should go without saying.

Date03:54:14, August 29, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Act of 2447
MessageI don't find this very necessary except for RP bills. Voting for actual articles is mostly about a party's set ideology, and it is only rarely that a party will change its vote on an ideologically charged bill.

But I'll support anyways, because it's a well-meaning idea that would (hopefully) increase participation.

Date11:15:01, August 29, 2007 CET
FromSuperhuman Creation Party
ToDebating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Act of 2447
MessageThe Cock-Rocket thing is a good idea actually

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 430

no
  

Total Seats: 169

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

Random quote: "Men's natures are alike, it is their habits that carry them far apart." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 50