Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5575
Next month in: 00:37:35
Server time: 11:22:24, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Right to Life 2450

Details

Submitted by[?]: Feathercreek Ecological Partnership

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2451

Description[?]:

We at the partnership assert that during the third trimester of pregnancy, the developmental stage of the baby is closer to a child than to a fetus. It is inhumane to take away that child's right to live. The first and second trimester of the pregnancy should give the prospective mother plenty of time to decide whether she wishes to go through with childbirth or not.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:45:58, September 05, 2007 CET
From Christian Nationalist Front
ToDebating the Right to Life 2450
MessageWe can not support this bill as the CNF has argued in the past abortion should be illegal.

Date15:56:56, September 05, 2007 CET
From Al'Badara Republican Party
ToDebating the Right to Life 2450
MessageWe would full heartedly support this bill.

Date01:14:32, September 06, 2007 CET
From Feathercreek Ecological Partnership
ToDebating the Right to Life 2450
MessageYou certainly can't claim that we are trying to further our pro-choice agenda (though, admittedly, many of our members have one). This is just a way to make the laws more rational. Remember, sometimes you have to take baby steps to get what you want.

Date02:08:10, September 06, 2007 CET
From People's Mujaheddin
ToDebating the Right to Life 2450
MessageThe PM will not endorse such a bill.

Date04:39:50, September 06, 2007 CET
From Christian Nationalist Front
ToDebating the Right to Life 2450
MessageWhile this is certainly true and in previous such instances we have voted in favour of bills that dont go far enough BUT unfortunately we can not support this as it is a critical issue to the CNF.

Date07:23:07, September 06, 2007 CET
From Al'Badara Republican Party
ToDebating the Right to Life 2450
MessageI implore that the CNF vote in favour of this bill in that this is going the right direction for them (although their terminus is further along than our station stop).

Date07:23:27, September 06, 2007 CET
From Al'Badara Republican Party
ToDebating the Right to Life 2450
MessageI as in the AAP not in me personally

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 52

no
      

Total Seats: 99

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "Before all else, be armed." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63