Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5483
Next month in: 00:31:26
Server time: 19:28:33, May 14, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Regulation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Malivi Revolutionary Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2452

Description[?]:

Comrades!

It has recently come to the MRF's attention that the bourgeois rulers of Malivia are allowing religious schools to sprout everywhere, like weeds. It is the MRF's stance that all religions are an impediment to the progress of the people and serve as tools of the bourgeoisie to obscure the worker's true objective in life, which is the proletarian revolution. The MRF will not presently oppose the principle of religion, as the balance of forces does not currently allow it. We will, however, demand that the state assume more responsibility towards the various churches and temples of Malivia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:26:29, September 06, 2007 CET
From New Conservative Party of Malivia
ToDebating the Religious Regulation Act
MessageWhy are you so hell-bent on oppressing the people of Malivia and removing their right to freedom of religion, to freely deciding where to send their kids to school, to own businesses, to earn wealth? Everyone in Malivia is afforded equal opportunity, all you seek to do is punish a group of people who have taken advantage of that opportunity. Grow up, and look at equality in a real context.

Date11:26:53, September 06, 2007 CET
From Radical Labor Confederation
ToDebating the Religious Regulation Act
MessageThere should be a separation of the churches and the state, but this goes too far.

Date12:09:42, September 06, 2007 CET
From Militarist Party
ToDebating the Religious Regulation Act
MessageAbsolutely not. As even the RPM stated, this goes way too far.

Date21:10:53, September 06, 2007 CET
From Malivi Revolutionary Front
ToDebating the Religious Regulation Act
MessageComrades!

There is no freedom in religion. Religion is, by its very nature, oppressive; and along with the illusion of opportunity, it is one of the many smoke-and-mirror systems employed by the bourgeois ruler to oppress the honest worker. The MRF knows that the pawns of imperialism like the NCPM know this, but purposely hide the truth from the populace - the worker will not be fooled!

Date21:12:21, September 06, 2007 CET
From Malivi Revolutionary Front
ToDebating the Religious Regulation Act
MessageOOC - also, my religious stance somehow changed to "moderate religious", which is rather embarrassing if I'm going to be playing a straight-up soviet revolutionary party

Date03:07:46, September 07, 2007 CET
From Radical Labor Confederation
ToDebating the Religious Regulation Act
MessageOOC: I think the MRF is a bit outnumbered on this one.

Date03:08:07, September 07, 2007 CET
From Radical Labor Confederation
ToDebating the Religious Regulation Act
MessageReligion has always been, and will probably always will be a part of Malivian life.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
        

Total Seats: 600

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted.

    Random quote: "Someone who wields power in name only can never compete with those who wield it through action." - Franz Reichert, former Luthorian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 68