We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP Recognized Religions
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2452
Description[?]:
| Currently only recognized religions are tax-exempted and, in the future, only recognized religions will be able to set up religious schools. As such, this bill defines which religions are recognized and which religions are not recognized in Darnussia. Recognized religions: - Christianism - Judaism Non-recognized religions: - Hobaism - Islam - Any other |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:43:49, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | Our government appears to be run by theocratic hooligans; we hope that the Patriots will withdraw in response to this atrocious proposal. |
| Date | 22:46:07, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Reform Party | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | We fully agree with the DLP |
| Date | 22:50:21, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | There are recognized/unrecognized religions everywhere. |
| Date | 22:52:55, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | Untrue; in enlightened, civilized societies, we have something called 'religious freedom', and another thing called 'separation of church and state'. |
| Date | 22:54:04, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Reform Party | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | That may be but we are strongly against giving a few selected religons money and the right to setup schools |
| Date | 23:43:51, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Jewish-Christian Alliance of Patriots | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | Strongly support. Why should we recognize the Hobaists who sold out our country, or the Islamists, who hate all that is good? |
| Date | 00:18:45, September 07, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | I would remind the Patriots that the Hobaist uprisings were a lifetime ago, and are hardly the sort of thing we should be worrying ourselves about in this day and age. |
| Date | 00:25:52, September 07, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | Perhaps we should: «the IPP will not return in the near future, but we still work our cause at grassroot level.» |
| Date | 00:30:46, September 07, 2007 CET | From | Loyalistische Partei | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | We support this. |
| Date | 03:12:32, September 07, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the CP Recognized Religions |
| Message | This is the best way to push Darnussian Hobaists into the IPP's camp. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 189 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 92 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "A society that has more justice is a society that needs less charity." - Ralph Nader |