We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gate Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Emblem Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2455
Description[?]:
Gated communities are not problems and should be legalized |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: No gated communities are allowed.
Current: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Proposed: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:02:45, September 11, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Gate Act |
Message | They encourage social division between the classes and therefore should be banned. |
Date | 17:44:49, September 11, 2007 CET | From | Left Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Gate Act |
Message | We don't think private citizens should be banned outright from living however they want to, but don't think it's the government's place to do so. We would only support allowing private establishment. |
Date | 21:43:41, September 12, 2007 CET | From | Pantheism Capitalistic Party UCF | To | Debating the Gate Act |
Message | Ooc: Are you sure the Emblem Party should be voting no? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 73 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 241 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 336 |
Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
Random quote: "My tenure will be controversial and it is, quite obviously, true that I am the most right-wing Prime Minister this country has seen in several decades.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician |