We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Libertarian Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Scientific Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2455
Description[?]:
This government has been trending towards oppressive as of late. This is unacceptable, our citizens should be free to do as they please without fear. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National policy regarding the desecration of the national flag.
Old value:: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Current: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Proposed: There are no regulations regarding the desecration or use of the national flag.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Proposed: The government does not involve itself in marriage or civil unions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:08:48, September 11, 2007 CET | From | Progressive Socialist Party | To | Debating the Civil Libertarian Act |
Message | We support article 2 but we oppose the rest of this bill which seems to be intended of introduce racism and segregation through the back door, undermine the legal protection of children and give ordinary families a load of unnecessary paper-work and legal trouble. The PSP condemns every form of racism. Thus we are strongly opposed to articles 1 and 5. Private institutions should be allowed a great amount of freedom to decide for themselves but when it comes to racism and segregation the interest of the individual not be be discriminated against must take precedence over the interest of private institutions to adhere to their own racistic prejudice. The articles concerning family law will make Jakania an Eldorado for pedophiles and other child abusers while it will make life more difficult for the vast majority of couples that are satisfied with the current state of their marriages. Ralph Debs PSP speaker on Justice |
Date | 00:17:43, September 12, 2007 CET | From | United Democrats of Jakania | To | Debating the Civil Libertarian Act |
Message | I'm just gonna say here, mainly because I don't want to go through all your bills. Our political views are nearly opposite, so, I oppose all of them |
Date | 01:03:14, September 12, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Union | To | Debating the Civil Libertarian Act |
Message | The DLU opposed all articles including Article 2. We've fought far too long racial equality for this type of proposition. Marcus O'Reallius Party Leader |
Date | 03:44:18, September 12, 2007 CET | From | World Wrestling Federation | To | Debating the Civil Libertarian Act |
Message | Disagree with Article 3 |
Date | 21:42:01, September 12, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Union | To | Debating the Civil Libertarian Act |
Message | We are torn with this proposition. Artilce 1 has merit, article 2 requires some further thought. We abstain. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 190 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 54 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 6 |
Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
Random quote: "The packaging for a microwavable 'microwave' dinner is programmed for a shelf life of maybe six months, a cook time of two minutes and a landfill dead-time of centuries." - David Wann |