Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:15:44
Server time: 19:44:15, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Libertarian Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Scientific Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2455

Description[?]:

This government has been trending towards oppressive as of late. This is unacceptable, our citizens should be free to do as they please without fear.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:08:48, September 11, 2007 CET
From Progressive Socialist Party
ToDebating the Civil Libertarian Act
MessageWe support article 2 but we oppose the rest of this bill which seems to be intended of introduce racism and segregation through the back door, undermine the legal protection of children and give ordinary families a load of unnecessary paper-work and legal trouble.

The PSP condemns every form of racism. Thus we are strongly opposed to articles 1 and 5. Private institutions should be allowed a great amount of freedom to decide for themselves but when it comes to racism and segregation the interest of the individual not be be discriminated against must take precedence over the interest of private institutions to adhere to their own racistic prejudice.

The articles concerning family law will make Jakania an Eldorado for pedophiles and other child abusers while it will make life more difficult for the vast majority of couples that are satisfied with the current state of their marriages.

Ralph Debs
PSP speaker on Justice

Date00:17:43, September 12, 2007 CET
From United Democrats of Jakania
ToDebating the Civil Libertarian Act
MessageI'm just gonna say here, mainly because I don't want to go through all your bills. Our political views are nearly opposite, so, I oppose all of them

Date01:03:14, September 12, 2007 CET
From Democratic Labour Union
ToDebating the Civil Libertarian Act
MessageThe DLU opposed all articles including Article 2. We've fought far too long racial equality for this type of proposition.

Marcus O'Reallius
Party Leader

Date03:44:18, September 12, 2007 CET
From World Wrestling Federation
ToDebating the Civil Libertarian Act
MessageDisagree with Article 3

Date21:42:01, September 12, 2007 CET
From Democratic Labour Union
ToDebating the Civil Libertarian Act
MessageWe are torn with this proposition. Artilce 1 has merit, article 2 requires some further thought. We abstain.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 190

no
   

Total Seats: 54

abstain
  

Total Seats: 6


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "The packaging for a microwavable 'microwave' dinner is programmed for a shelf life of maybe six months, a cook time of two minutes and a landfill dead-time of centuries." - David Wann

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66