Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:27:42
Server time: 19:32:17, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AR Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: New bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertad Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2456

Description[?]:

It's a bill, OMGesus

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:17:51, September 13, 2007 CET
FromLibertad Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessageSo....Thoughts on the matter?

Date01:21:13, September 14, 2007 CET
FromStoic Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessageI support Article 1
But I would like to hear the reasoning behind Article 2 before I can fully support this bill.

Date08:38:53, September 14, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessageHmm. I've always supported the current age of majority, due to various safety standards, we can't be handing out drivers licenses to kids at 16, they'd have to start practicing at 14, for example.
Then again, their are voting and civil right concerns.
It is this party's opinion that Zardugali civil liberties extend to the point that one doesn't have to be a legal adult to experience them. Seeing as some boys are still going through/just starting puberty at 16, 18 is a sensible age of majority to ensure the safety of our citizens.
As for article 2, this party understands the reasoning behind it, but this would prevent our military from winning a war in the best possible way for Zardugal. These are Zardugalis we're talking about; they're not about to gas innocent citizens. This measure would only put more restrictions on the defense of Zardugal. Reason over law.

Date12:46:53, September 14, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Trade Unionist Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessageWhile we support Article 1, we don not support Article 2 for the same reason as the Liberty Party

Date05:56:44, September 15, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessagePerhaps the Libertad Party will remove Article 2 then proceed to voting, as the general coalescences is that this bill won't pass with Article 2 attached.

Date15:53:57, September 15, 2007 CET
FromLibertad Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessageWhile we would be willing to rewrite the article pertaining to the age limit, the party is confused as to which article to you are referring to, as you began discussing the chemical weapons policies in article 1.

Date17:26:38, September 15, 2007 CET
FromStoic Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessageTo better clarify, we support the legal age change but not the limit on chemical and biological weapons.

OOC: I swear they were reversed when I firsted posted.

Date17:50:48, September 15, 2007 CET
FromLibertad Party
ToDebating the New bill
MessageI can adjust that. Agreed, and I'll move it to vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 47

no
   

Total Seats: 187

abstain
  

Total Seats: 167


Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum!

Random quote: "Politics is the art of postponing decisions until they are no longer relevant." - Henri Queuille

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61