We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sexual Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Urban Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2456
Description[?]:
| In order to increase personal freedoms and civil rights, we, the LDS, propose this bill: |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for everyone.
Current: All forms of pornography are illegal.
Proposed: All forms of pornography are legal for everyone.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:04:44, September 14, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | I wish to predict the N.A.P.s position: "More like sexual wrongs!!!!!1111!!" |
| Date | 18:28:07, September 14, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | Porn involving children and non-consenting adults IS wrong. |
| Date | 19:17:10, September 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | Yes indeed but it seems that this nation is quite free on this matter...if prostitution is legal and recognised as a well respected proffession, then why do you hesitate on this? |
| Date | 20:33:47, September 14, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | We are free on the matter that consenting adults can be prostitutes, not children or women being forced to prostitute themselves. If an adult chooses to be a prostitute or make pornographic moves, fine. I don't see how thinking adults should be able to be prostitutes if they want means I should support a law legalizing child pornography and rape. |
| Date | 01:34:51, September 15, 2007 CET | From |  National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | We do! |
| Date | 02:55:48, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | :( |
| Date | 09:27:32, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | interesting outcome |
| Date | 15:05:26, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Sexual Rights |
| Message | I stand corrected. :P |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 373 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 132 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The more you observe politics, the more you've got to admit that each party is worse than the other." - Will Rogers |