We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cavalier Programme: Health
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ancient and Noble Order of the Cavaliers
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2456
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Health and safety legislation for industry.
Old value:: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Current: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Proposed: Health and safety laws are to be determined by local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning organ donations.
Old value:: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Current: Organ donations are legal with personal consent.
Proposed: Organ donations are legal with personal consent.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:27:08, September 14, 2007 CET | From |  Stoic Party | To | Debating the Cavalier Programme: Health |
| Message | Wish I had seen this one earlier, Articles 2 and 3 are great but I can't agree to 1 |
| Date | 05:48:49, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Cavalier Programme: Health |
| Message | 1 is taking away a women's right to choose. The fetus, which, like say, a tree, has no rights. Therefore you can't murder it. It is only their by permission. There is no such right to be inside someone else's body. 2 is unnecessary, this party believes a set of voluntarily regulations from the central government would be most beneficial to workers and employers. That way, different provinces can adopt the regulations to suit their conditions. 3 would just drain our health system because of the added bureaucracy, the current policy allows for efficiency in harvesting healthy organs without infringing on the decease's rights; while they were alive they had the option to opt out. |
| Date | 15:30:03, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Libertad Party | To | Debating the Cavalier Programme: Health |
| Message | I have no problems with 1 and 3, but I can't work with two. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 101 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 215 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 85 |
| Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
| Random quote: "I believe that guns don't kill people, husbands that come home early do." - Larry the Cable Guy |