Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 03:27:42
Server time: 20:32:17, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pension System Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Supreme Party of the Republic

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2458

Description[?]:

To reform our pension system for fairer one where a person can decide if it wants a pension and if it is a private or state owned one.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:56:50, September 17, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Pension System Bill
MessageWe'd prefer that there be some form of compulsory pension system, and since we like to privatize nearly everything, it should be a private system.

Date22:15:40, September 17, 2007 CET
FromSupreme Party of the Republic
ToDebating the Pension System Bill
MessageBut we think that a monopoly of the pension system should not be in the hands of the private sector. We just wanted to take the compulsory of the law and by that allow the workers to better plan their economies.

Date22:46:52, September 17, 2007 CET
FromFascists for Christ
ToDebating the Pension System Bill
MessageCompulsory pensions are necessary so that the elderly do not become a burden on the state in their declining years just because they wanted to have more money in their youth.

Date23:01:44, September 17, 2007 CET
FromSupreme Party of the Republic
ToDebating the Pension System Bill
MessageI think the Fascists for Christ have mistaken the concept of this bill: one shall receive whatever he has saved on the pension system. In our system everyone has the right to retire and receive a state-sponsored pension. This bill will make possible to person to choose which system suits them best and if they think that retirement money is not needed they`ll have to face the consequences of their acts or try one of the elder projects that we created when we are at the head of the Ministry of Heath and Social Services.

Date23:14:57, September 17, 2007 CET
FromSupreme Party of the Republic
ToDebating the Pension System Bill
Messagejust a correction: when we WERE at the head....

Date19:31:22, September 18, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Pension System Bill
MessageWe have decided to accept the NUP's views on this matter.

Date22:55:16, September 18, 2007 CET
FromDorvik Socialist Party
ToDebating the Pension System Bill
MessageWe agree that people should be able to take a private pension, but we also think that a compulsory public pension is necessary.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 178

no
   

Total Seats: 176

abstain
   

Total Seats: 45


Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game.

Random quote: "Global warming, at least the modern nightmare vision, is a myth. I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's politicians and policy makers are not." - David Bellamy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63