Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:02:35
Server time: 23:57:24, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Klexi | Svet-Aldegar | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2096

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party for Equality

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2097

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:11:17, August 16, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2096
Messagesorry, RWLP, you had your chance. If you wanted to keep the previous cabinet in power by stalling, I dont want you in the cabinet. If you were just being picky I am sorry, but I don't have the time to find out.

Date22:12:11, August 16, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2096
MessageYou did have the time to suggest that while it was in debate, which was quite a long time, so forgive me for assuming that the former was your reason.

Date02:34:33, August 17, 2005 CET
FromSöhne der Freiheit
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2096
MessageI call for all my fellow particracy players to oppose this on OOC grounds. The LPE came to power through a bug, a bug which Wouter acknowledges and seeks to fix. In the meantime however, she is ramming through her bills regardless of the unfairness of this bug and her majority, and she doesn't even seek to compromise as seen by her removal of the opposition in the face of RWLP's request to be the Minister of Defence.

Date13:12:49, August 17, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2096
MessageI have not given myself an unfair proportion of cabinet positions. If I was seeking to control the entire cabinet, that would indeed be unfair, but here four of our parties are included, in a relatively fair ratio, not reflecting my excessive number of seats. In my opinion this is a perfectly valid cabinet.

Date13:16:03, August 17, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2096
Messageplus it wasn't a request, put politely, with a question mark, but a demanding statement. If the phrase was 'could I please have the position of minister for the defense?' or even 'I will support if you make me minister for defense' I may have considered.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 95

no
   

Total Seats: 83

abstain
   

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731

Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61