We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Mandatory Vote Explanation Information
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2465
Description[?]:
| OOC: All votes for most bills have to be explained. Information having to do with this in detail is provided here. The original Vote Explaining Act; http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=136474 Details on when you have to explain; http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=141281 Punishment for not complying; http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=141282 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:12:31, September 21, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Information |
| Message | For the time being this is not in effect. It can be brought back into effect with a passing vote. |
| Date | 19:38:51, September 22, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Information |
| Message | Considering the legislation in question is no longer in effect, you might as well take this down. |
| Date | 21:18:07, September 22, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Information |
| Message | It can be put back into effect with enough yes votes, so I'm gonna keep it up. |
| Date | 10:04:45, October 03, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Information |
| Message | I'm putting this to vote for historical purposes. Voting for this will not mean it's being re-established, rather that if it brought back into use via a majority (60%) yes vote, these will/would be the laws/rules and guidelines. |
| Date | 10:22:39, October 03, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Information |
| Message | So the CeC believe in forcing future parties to have to make rules from scratch should they decide to instate this? |
| Date | 02:59:27, October 04, 2007 CET | From |  Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Information |
| Message | Yes, we believe if a vote explanation act is re-drafted then it should be then that the rules are decided. |
| Date | 14:26:26, October 04, 2007 CET | From | Pan-Sekowan Fascist Front | To | Debating the Mandatory Vote Explanation Information |
| Message | I just like to be against SCP and DSP, I have no real reason to vote no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 242 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 141 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 216 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "Racism isn't born, folks; it's taught. I have a two-year-old son. You know what he hates? Naps! End of list." - Dennis Leary |