We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Wild Animal Ownership Bill of 2458 II
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2459
Description[?]:
| The DSP, after noting the objections to the first bill of this name proposes this bill as an alternative, as we are willing to compromise. This bill allows for non-dangerous wild animals to be kept as pets. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:35:53, September 20, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Wild Animal Ownership Bill of 2458 II |
| Message | And why should people not be able to have a garden snake, rabbit, squirrel etc. as a pet? |
| Date | 08:09:32, September 21, 2007 CET | From | Plato's Republican Party | To | Debating the Wild Animal Ownership Bill of 2458 II |
| Message | Now this is a reasonable bill that we in the PRP can understand. Wild animals can make perfectly fine pets provided that they pose little danger. |
| Date | 22:03:24, September 21, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Wild Animal Ownership Bill of 2458 II |
| Message | The DSP requests to know why the CeC and PSFF are voting against this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 331 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 147 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 121 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "Prejudices subsist in people's imagination long after they have been destroyed by their experience." - Ernest Dimnet |