We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private ownership act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2459
Description[?]:
| I don't want the Gov't fatcats to steal my land! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:53:58, September 22, 2007 CET | From | Love Life Happiness | To | Debating the Private ownership act |
| Message | We need a new rapid transit line! |
| Date | 15:07:00, September 22, 2007 CET | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Private ownership act |
| Message | YES! Land ownership should be an entitlement. We fully support this Pro-Property Rights proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 193 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 524 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "If Lincoln were alive today, he’d be turning over in his grave." - Gerald Ford |