We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Judicial Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertà Parti
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2461
Description[?]:
Neither our judges nor doctors are gods. Before you fascists refute that statement, may I remind you that these doctors and judges might not like your party. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to appeal against a judgement rendered by a court.
Old value:: All judgements are final and binding; appealing against them is not possible.
Current: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Proposed: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Only a medical regulatory body can prosecute a doctor for malpractice.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:13:30, September 24, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List | To | Debating the Judicial Reform |
Message | We strongly support this Bill. |
Date | 07:48:35, September 25, 2007 CET | From | Permissive Social Union | To | Debating the Judicial Reform |
Message | LFF finds this extension of civil liberties more than just a little unpalatable. No. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 323 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 343 |
Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |