We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Democratic Governance Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvik Social Democrats
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2038
Description[?]:
We, the parties of this splendid Republic, call upon the legislature to accept this piece of legislation, to amend our glorious Constitution. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | Coalitions would still need the backing of > 50% of the seats of course, but this prevents certain types of deadlocks. This effectively introduces a semi-presidential system like France's. |
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | I like this idea. Does this mean the head of state might not be in the cabinet? |
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | This adds a whole new tactical, political level to the game. I like it, if only there were more right wingers to form a coalition with. |
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | It indeed means the head of state's party might not be in the cabinet. This situtation happens in most systems with a weak head of state, and in some systems with a strong head of state (France). |
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | This adds a whole new tactical, political level to the game. I like it, if only there were more right wingers to form a coalition with. |
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | Come on, 11 seats! |
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | Splendid! |
Date | not recorded | From | Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | Anonomity in Dorvik... this is a first :-) |
Date | 17:28:18, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Democratic Governance Act |
Message | TEST http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1059&mforum=particracy |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 200 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "You will win, but you will not convince. You will win, because you possess more than enough brute force, but you will not convince, because to convince means to persuade. And in order to persuade you would need what you lack, reason and right in the struggle." - Miguel de Unamuno |