Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 02:26:16
Server time: 13:33:43, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | JVTA | lulus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Professional Fire Fighters

Details

Submitted by[?]: Tuesday Is Coming

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2099

Description[?]:

We currently require local governments to provide public fire departments. This will allow the private sector to manage this duty more efficiently, while allowing the local governments to choose from a competitive selection of companies.

Proposed: The government competitively subcontracts firefighting services.

This bill will require local governments to choose from different firms offering firefighting services. Each city/county/town will be responsible for hiring a certain level of fire department services.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:00:19, August 18, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
Messagereserving any comment until an actual bill is presented.

Date18:15:06, August 18, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
MessageNo subcontracting, leave it to local governments.

Date19:03:35, August 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
Message"reserving any comment until an actual bill is presented."

Any suggestions on the description for this one?

Date21:54:18, August 18, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
Messagewe would prefer a volunteer firefighting department, over selling the rights to fight fires to the highest bidder. Volunteer firefighters are far more likely to take pride in their work than companies driven by the profit motive, and we are not at all sure that fighting fires is a job for the private sector -- quite apart from the fact that we would prefer to see this left to local governments.

We are willing to be persuaded otherwise, but only by a bill presenting concrete arguments as to the need to make this change. So we can hardly make suggestions...

Date00:22:02, August 19, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
MessageOOC

This will be left in debate until I have enough free time to commit to a productive debate here. Classes just started and Ive been kindof busy.

Date01:11:48, August 19, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
MessageThe current situation is that there are untrained non specialists risking their lives very bravely but ineffectively and unfortunately many innocent people are dying or being badly injured due to their well meaning but incompetent service. In addition to this there is a non competitive system of purchasing equipment using public funds and a never ending expense account that is ineficient in meeting its proposed purpose.

What this bill proposes is to place the provision of this essential service in the hands of trained professionals, using the leatest and most eficient equipment, all at a lower cost to the public, both in financial terms and in lives and injuries. A volunteer fireman has to have some other occupation, which prevents them from being able to keep fully up to date on techniques, prevents them from keeping in peak physical condition and adds long delays to the response times to emergency calls. There would be, however, nothing preventing a charity organisation from tendering a bid to provide this service, provided they can meet the minimum standards that will be included in the contract terms.

The argument that the service would be given automaticaly to the lowest bidder ignores the terms of the contract that will require certain performance standards, responsse time guarantees, equipment age limits etc. The service will provide the cover needed, as decided by the local government, at the lowest cost to the tax payer.

Date05:27:41, August 19, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
MessageLet the local government decide whether they want to subcontract or not. If Rapula feel the need to subcontract, so be it, if Golavia wants a state fire department, we should not be the ones to deprive them of that right.

Date23:22:44, August 19, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
Messagewe suggest that the local governments bill be passed for now, and this one be revisited once the TIC party has had time to decide what it wishes to achieve.

Date23:38:27, August 19, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
Message((Ill let ASP propose this bill.

Im getting busier in RL...girls, parties, college, etc.)

Date21:57:47, August 21, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
MessageIf you're not putting it to a vote, maybe cancel it to reduce clutter.

Date22:25:29, August 21, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Professional Fire Fighters
MessageAt the request of the ASP:
"I don't have time to debate much at the moment...
...it is your bill, you present it."

It will be put to a vote shortly.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 239

no
     

Total Seats: 211

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation.

    Random quote: "The radical of one century is the conservative of the next. The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them." - Mark Twain

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 67