We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protector-General version 2.0
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberty Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2464
Description[?]:
| Forgot to add the proposal last time... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: President of the Republic
Current: Ŝtatestro (Head of State)
Proposed: Protector-General of Zardugal
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:16:05, October 01, 2007 CET | From |  Liberty Party | To | Debating the Protector-General version 2.0 |
| Message | OCC: Why not NAM? |
| Date | 13:45:56, October 01, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Protector-General version 2.0 |
| Message | Short and simple: It doesn't sounds nice to me. |
| Date | 10:15:11, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Protector-General version 2.0 |
| Message | OCC: Wouldn't think it would, it's a very Anglo Saxon term, unlike the German style you'd be used to. |
| Date | 10:23:02, October 02, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Protector-General version 2.0 |
| Message | Well, thats maybe true but Ijust can vote on the base of my opinion. |
| Date | 12:04:53, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Protector-General version 2.0 |
| Message | OCC That is true. I'm not objecting to your opinion, I was just curious as to why you didn't like it. It's not like I have to convince a party with no seats to vote for my bills :P |
| Date | 12:49:30, October 02, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Protector-General version 2.0 |
| Message | Protector General sounds like our state as terribly threaten and needs someone to protect. |
| Date | 10:55:41, October 03, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Protector-General version 2.0 |
| Message | OCC Yeah, you really do have to grow up with English and know a bit about British politics (I'm Australian so a few of our Royal Connections have names like these) to understand this term. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 322 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 79 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." - Emma Goldman |