We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Defense Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvish Popular Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2038
Description[?]:
| We think police need more weapons in the fight against crime. Criminals have access to all sorts of weapons, so we should also arm police or they will be at a serious disadvantage. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Current: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Police Defense Act |
| Message | I envision the police having kevlar helmets, flak jackets, assault rifles and tear gas grenades :D |
| Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Police Defense Act |
| Message | Are the dorvic streets so dangerous to equip ALL police with military grade, extremely expensive weapons? Maybe some special intervensions squads, but I don't think police officers in an asscrack town where stealing potatoes is the most serious offence allow for kevlar armor. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Police Defense Act |
| Message | I'm sure the electorate appreciate being called an 'asscrack town'. Of course highly armed police are necessary, they will deter potato thieves. Never again do Dorvikians have to hide their potatoes from criminals! |
| Date | not recorded | From |  Dorvik Social Democrats | To | Debating the Police Defense Act |
| Message | Why not give them nukes. |
| Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Police Defense Act |
| Message | I do think police should have access to military grade equipment, but it shouldn't be standard. Sidearms work well enough most of the time, especially considering the populace is now armed to the teeth. :) |
| Date | not recorded | From | Noordelijk Bevrijding Front | To | Debating the Police Defense Act |
| Message | hah |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 122 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 78 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine |