We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privacy intrusion
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Army Left Movement
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2465
Description[?]:
| Only nationals matters can violate privacy |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:02:48, October 01, 2007 CET | From |  Libertad Party | To | Debating the Privacy intrusion |
| Message | "While we support proposition 2, we are against propsition 1 that it actually reduces the effectiveness of that law." -Donovan Christoph |
| Date | 00:46:20, October 02, 2007 CET | From | National Authoritarian Movement | To | Debating the Privacy intrusion |
| Message | "Again, the NAM has to agree with the LP. We fully support proposal 2 while we cannot accept proposal 1." |
| Date | 09:54:47, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Privacy intrusion |
| Message | "YOU FUC---" "Jarrad! I'll take this one. Members of the Directory, we will not support article one as it reduces the effectiveness of our Justice Dept., and we have yet to take a stance on article two." ~President Rowan Payne |
| Date | 18:27:16, October 02, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Army Left Movement | To | Debating the Privacy intrusion |
| Message | "Since the many request and that we are here to improve our society system, we removed the article that was not so supported. We are here for build a better law not for say the opposite just because of a name like the Liberty Party" F.Bertin - Communist Party of UPZ |
| Date | 09:51:52, October 03, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Privacy intrusion |
| Message | "Though I'm not quite sure I understand the Communist's language, the Liberty Party will support the use of an independent court order to reveal limited private records pertaining to the individual in question." ~President Rowan Payne |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 316 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 85 |
| Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer. |
| Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |