Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:31:06
Server time: 11:28:53, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): echizen | Freemarket21 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Radio Stations

Details

Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Army Left Movement

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2465

Description[?]:

Improving our National radio brodcast

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:10:32, October 03, 2007 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Radio Stations
Message"Waste of tax payer's money. If there was a market for the services public radio would provide, then private stations will spring up and survive on a commercial basis."

~Susan Copper, Shadow Minister of Education and Culture for the Liberty Party

Date17:49:03, October 03, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary Army Left Movement
ToDebating the Radio Stations
Message"we already use tax payer's money for radio station, and right now no other station are allowed, so if you want them to come up, you have to permit to them to exist first"

F.Bertin

Date18:02:29, October 03, 2007 CET
From Ancient and Noble Order of the Cavaliers
ToDebating the Radio Stations
Message"There is no provision in the current law forbidding private stations."

-the Lord Byngham

Date18:03:24, October 03, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary Army Left Movement
ToDebating the Radio Stations
Message"There are no provision that they are allowed too"

F.Bertin

Date18:18:53, October 03, 2007 CET
From National Authoritarian Movement
ToDebating the Radio Stations
MessageOCC: @ Cavlier: It's the third time that you have a strange interpretation on what is meant by the predefined descriptions of bill-options. When nothing different is said, "The government subsidises a national radio station for educational and informational purposes" means that there are no other stations. Otherwise, options like "The government subsidises independent non profit making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed." would not make any sense.

Date03:03:11, October 04, 2007 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Radio Stations
MessageOCC:

I think I'll have to clear this up with OCC talk so....."All radio stations are owned by the state" would be the option in which no other stations are privately owned. When they say "National" state, they mean by that a Nationalized Station owned by the state exists, like the BBC, ABC, NBC to name a few.

The government doesn't have to OK private stations, the bill just says it subsidizes one Nationalized Station.

In the bill NAM proposes, the government will subsidize several stations that serve the same basic purpose of the one Nation Station, with private ones existing too, they put that in to show the state doesn't go round subsidizing any radio station that broadcasts the news every now and again and call that "educational services".


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 0

no
    

Total Seats: 316

abstain
  

Total Seats: 85


Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62