We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Concealed weaponry act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Secular Humanist party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2466
Description[?]:
| when people are forced to carry weapons openly, criminals can easily see who is defenceless. Giving them information that hjelps them choose weak victims is not a good thing. Allow people to conceal weapons and keep attackers guessing. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapon concealment.
Old value:: Where weapons are carried, this must be done openly.
Current: Where weapons are carried, this must be done openly.
Proposed: Any legal weapon may be concealed when carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:25:37, October 06, 2007 CET | From | Regional Acronym Political Establishment | To | Debating the Concealed weaponry act |
| Message | The SHP should be commended for introducing such a fine piece of legislation. We support this completely. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 366 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 76 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 308 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H. L. Mencken |