We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2467
Description[?]:
As you may know, our party sent out a letter to each Party Leader in the Legislature advocating that for the elections of 2455/2459 that maybe we can experiment with proposing a "Presidential Platform," if you will, which would consists of ALL of the proposals and Treaty's that we would like to see enacted as the Law of this great Republic. However, if you decided that that was a good idea, we must double the bill quota from 25 to 50 in which we can always RE-change the quota after the 2455/2459 elections. This is a NON-Partisan bill. Thank you for your full support. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 12
Current: 20
Proposed: 20
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 12
Current: 50
Proposed: 50
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:45:45, October 07, 2007 CET | From | Kapitalist-Arbeitsfamilien Partei | To | Debating the Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act |
Message | There was a TYPO in the election date. We mean Election(s) of 2469!!! |
Date | 06:24:44, October 07, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act |
Message | We need to accumulate huge drifts of legislation.. why? |
Date | 13:53:51, October 07, 2007 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act |
Message | We received no such correspondence, but can see no reason not to support this measure. |
Date | 18:47:37, October 07, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List | To | Debating the Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act |
Message | We, like the AMSP, were not contacted. As such, we have no idea what is going on. |
Date | 18:49:05, October 07, 2007 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act |
Message | We retract. There is a large enough burden on Convocation already, and we require definitive evidence of benefit before we can approve this measure. |
Date | 19:46:53, October 07, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Workers' Party and CTUL List | To | Debating the Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act |
Message | Upon studying the Bill, we have concluded that while we would be willing to support extending the number of proposals distributed to each Party, we find the current proposed maximum accumulation to be far too high. This would drown Convocational democracy as we know it. |
Date | 01:55:07, October 08, 2007 CET | From | Neue Kommunistische Liga | To | Debating the Let Each Party Establish Their Own Presidential Platform of 2466 Act |
Message | I see no reason why it should be increased. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 402 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 264 |
Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire. |
Random quote: "It only takes 20 years for a liberal to become a conservative without changing a single idea." - Robert Anton Wilson |