We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Security Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Commercial Freedom
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2099
Description[?]:
| We believe that should our police force fail to look after a serious dispute the military should be called in for national defence. In cases of emergency such as terrorism to heavily armed robberies (in which the police and the military can cooperate) the military should be able to step in to protect our nation's citizens, buildings, and other possesions. But only in emergencies where trained soldiers are absolutely needed should the military step in. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:19:20, August 19, 2005 CET | From |  Commercial Freedom | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | Please remember that the police and military would work together in only the most extreme circumstances to prevent the loss of more innocent lives. Any suggestions? |
| Date | 11:59:12, August 19, 2005 CET | From | New Frontier Party | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | I support this worthy effort |
| Date | 13:10:33, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Enlightened Socialist Party | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | We support. |
| Date | 14:46:24, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Liberty Party of Saridan | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | We support. |
| Date | 04:14:04, August 20, 2005 CET | From | freedom party | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | We currently support. Although the authors big government policies has us a little worried. Wed hate to see the military at a protest or something of the nature. |
| Date | 10:28:55, August 20, 2005 CET | From | Commercial Freedom | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | No you don't need to worry about that, we don't consider that as a serious emergency. |
| Date | 23:20:11, August 20, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | You may not, but future ruling groups may. Who knows. This opens the door up for serious abuses. We will not support, though we are sympathetic. |
| Date | 11:11:09, August 21, 2005 CET | From | Commercial Freedom | To | Debating the National Security Bill |
| Message | We are prepared to take that risk or else all powers should be stripped from rulers in case they "abuse their powers". This bill is going up for vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 232 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 68 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius, and a lot of courage, to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein |