We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nationalisation of Banks
Details
Submitted by[?]: Workers Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2471
Description[?]:
The Workers Party proposes the nationalisation of the big banks. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The banking system.
Old value:: The government operates a central bank and all other banks are private.
Current: All banks are privately owned.
Proposed: The government operates large, national banks, but small community based private banks are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:52:03, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Nationalisation of Banks |
Message | This is not some form of Socialist-loving, dictatorship where the government owns all industry. I remind the workers Party that this is verging on a policy that would give the government too much power. Sir Thomas Hill, Conservative Party Leader. |
Date | 21:06:05, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation of Banks |
Message | We would like to remind Sir Thomas Hill, (New) Conservative Party Leader, of two things. First, banks are no "industry". Second, this is the Senate of the Republic of Solentia, not the playground of an elementary school. The Workers Party is a socialist party, and there is nothing that Sir Thomas Hill and his New Conservative Party can do, except go whining into the pages of the Daily Chronicle. Elisabeth Barret Browning Quesada - Workers Party Senate Leader |
Date | 23:36:09, October 14, 2007 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Nationalisation of Banks |
Message | "First, banks are no "industry"." Banks are not fully governmentally controlled, they have an industrial circle in their own right as they can be, and should be, dominated by the Private sector. "Second, this is the Senate of the Republic of Solentia, not the playground of an elementary school." I say the same to you sir. "The Workers Party is a socialist party, and there is nothing that Sir Thomas Hill and his New Conservative Party can do, except go whining into the pages of the Daily Chronicle." The Worker's party can be whatever they please, it doesnt make Solentia share the same views or warped ideals. |
Date | 00:32:35, October 15, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation of Banks |
Message | That's the reason why we have a Senate, Sir Thomas Hill - to decide what Solentia will be. We are proposing that the banks be nationalised; we understand that the NCPS is against that. So we understand that the NCPS is going to vote "no", as is their right as a party and their duty to those who elected you. Please understand that is not only our right as a party, but also our duty towards those who elected us, to propose this bill and to vote "yes". Elizabeth Barret Browning Quesada - Workers Party Senate Leader |
Date | 00:36:39, October 15, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation of Banks |
Message | Oh, and, Sir Thomas, can you be kind enough to not address me as "Sir"? Elisabeth Barret Browning Quesada - Workers Party Senate Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 161 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 181 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 29 |
Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
Random quote: "Abortion is inherently different from other medical procedures because no other procedure involves the purposeful termination of a potential life." - Potter Stewart |