We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2471
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2473
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet - basically the same as the current, but since the prime minister currently also is the new chancellor we want to replace the prime minister. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Red Dawn
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Bicky Forever - MSCC
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Red Dawn
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Ikradonian Faith Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Ikradonian Faith Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Ikradonian Faith Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Red Dawn
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Bicky Forever - MSCC
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Red Dawn
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Red Dawn
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Bicky Forever - MSCC
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Red Dawn
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Ikradonian Faith Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:45:19, October 16, 2007 CET | From | Ikradonian Interest | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2471 |
Message | Any proposal which includes incompetent people on posts as finance and foreign affairs should be thrown in the bin. |
Date | 13:26:19, October 16, 2007 CET | From | Red Dawn | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2471 |
Message | Both of our coalition partners have proved more than competent. And as for incompetence, what did your administration actually do? |
Date | 19:31:08, October 16, 2007 CET | From | Bicky Forever - MSCC | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2471 |
Message | Well, their administration actually did nothing. However, you cannot accuse II of doing nothing. They are even proposing a cabinet proposal themselves. The only thing they have to learn is finding a majority in parliament, quite crucial actually. |
Date | 20:03:16, October 16, 2007 CET | From | Ikradonian Interest | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2471 |
Message | Funny that BF jumps on this one, after all the advice we've been giving Mr Baker lately. |
Date | 23:22:24, October 17, 2007 CET | From | Ikradonian Faith Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2471 |
Message | While it's nice that II offers its advice freely, we value the voters' advice more. BF clearly got a new mandate from the voters, and that's what counts in the end. |
Date | 11:55:47, October 18, 2007 CET | From | Red Dawn | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2471 |
Message | I do find it intriguing that Red Dawn is the only party not accused of incompetence by II. Ah, well - guess they cover it all other times they mention us. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 154 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 145 |
Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
Random quote: "Global warming is indeed a scam, perpetrated by scientists with vested interests, but in need of crash courses in geology, logic and the philosophy of science." - Dr. Martin Keeley |